| Every time I start up my computer the area by the clock in bottom right
corner of the screen ends up looking like an information-age bus stop. Tiny icons queue up
there to wink and blink at me. Microsoft calls this area the system tray, and once I
figured out that each icon gave me instant status of critical computer functions, it
became one the most important (if smallest) sections of my screen. The key to the system
tray's utility is not quick navigation, but instant information on battery life, network
status, and even speaker volume. When I need more information, I can hover my mouse over
the icon for a popup message (oops, 10 minutes of battery remaining!) or click to change
settings. Wouldnt it be nice if your reports and memos had system trays? If they
did, then critical information would jump out at us and extra detail would be just a click
away. Today, finding critical information in even a one page executive summary can be a
chore. Just imagine getting 5-plus pages of dense spreadsheet data dropped in your inbox.
In general, gleaning useful information from printouts seems to require a green eyeshade
and infinite time and patience.
Summaries may obscure data
I am not trying to convince you that your reports have too much information, or that we
need more summaries and executive overviews. In my experience, most reports have too
little information for people to make good decisions. The purpose of a summary is to find
problems or opportunities quickly, but more often summaries obscure the numbers you need
to see. For example, lets take the numbers 8, 5, 6, 1, and 5. The summary (average)
of this is 5, which tells you nothing. Even if I showed you all the numbers they still
mean nothing without a meaningful reference (in this case, they are my familys
scores on the windmill hole of the mini-golf course).
A well-designed executive information system (EIS) might help you solve this problem
for about 25 percent of the cases. But there is a much more cost-effective solution:
color. Now that most documents and reports are electronic and color printer are very
affordable, the days of black-on-white reports should be over. Unfortunately, the truth is
that nearly all reports produced today are still colorless.
Lets jump into some real-world examples. One of my clients sells ready-mix
concrete. Concrete is sold by the yard and delivered to your doorstep by cement trucks, so
driver performance is a key competitive weapon for this company. It previously used fairly
typical reports that listed driver hours, lateness, no shows, and so on. Putting this
information together in a meaningful way was virtually impossible. As the client's new
application was being implemented, essentially duplicated most of its current reports, but
in the process we transformed those reports into very powerful tools using color.
The new system assigns color to specific truck driver comments: red for no show, pink
for late, green for maintenance. When these colors are overlaid onto the standard reports
the really important information (driver performance) jumps out very clearly. The
consequence is that managers can immediately spot problem drivers and tackle the issues
before they cost the company money or customers.
Does this really work? When you compare the company's June data to its July data the
impact is obvious (see figures). June is spattered with red and pink boxes that in July
are mostly blank except for a touch of pink. The difference is real and measurable, and it
was not new data, but new presentation that made the difference.
[text continues after figures...]
|
 [Click on image to enlarge]
Problems jump from the page, thanks to color-coding in this June report on
driver performance for a concrete company. Red cells indicate driver no-shows; pink
cells show when drivers were late; green cells show when trucks were down for maintenance. |
 [Click on image to enlarge]
The same report a month later shows absenteeism has almost disappeared, and
late starts have been cut substantially. Color coding information draws managers'
attention to key data, and enables them to act quickly to correct problems or exploit new
opportunities. |
| A second client tracks production on injection molding machines. It is
critical to maximize the efficiency of these expensive assets. The company's new
production monitoring system compiles statistics at the end of each shift and posts the
results to their Intranet.
Color coding efficiency
The reports are not raw numbers but color-coded efficiency data. Results by machine,
job, shift, and cell are presented in green (110-90 percent), yellow (89-80 percent), and
red (less than 80 percent) so machines that are running poorly are immediately obvious.
System errors and missing data are flagged in blue and quickly addressed because the
report forum is so public.
To make the system really powerful, my client uses a special efficiency methodology
that shows both the overall performance and the factors contributing to the raw numbers.
If overall production efficiency is 82 percent (yellow) you can quickly see that
everything was running in the 90 percent (green) range except one factor (scrap generated
at 73 percent, red). Supervisors and managers can review plant performance in seconds and
immediately address the problems. Their old system did not generate any reports at all
until weeks after the fact.
While colorful reports may have big impacts on screen, what happens when the toner
meets the paper? A lot! Color printing is ubiquitous (if under-used) in todays
workplace. Shared color inkjet printers are now as common as laser printers and nearly as
fast. I cant imagine a home office without one. For the heavy hitters, color laser
printers have reached commodity status. Truly cutting-edge companies may forgo the color
printers and jump right to conference room computer projectors for presentations. (Imagine
presenting a report to the CEO and fielding a question with, "Lets drill down
and find out
").
Before you draft up a memo demanding all reports use color, make certain that everyone
agrees to what will be color-highlighted and what colors will be used. Even heated
discussions over such simple issues as where to set the cut off between yellow and green
(90 percent? 87 percent?). And how will you handle it if your lone-wolf engineer decides
she likes 97.5 percent instead? The problems multiply when you want to highlight numbers
based on a hidden calculation. You may be left wondering whether your CFO highlights gross
revenue based on variance from budget or variance from net profit in the income report.
Adding color to your reports and memos is not going to replace the $3 million EIS your
CIO has been begging for. But then again, it does not take much return value to give you a
huge ROI on that $250 color inkjet printer.
|